![]() |
| Front Cover of No to AV campaign leaflet |
Here are my picks of the errors and lies:
![]() |
| First double page spread featuring 6 issues |
(Apologies for the incorrect numbering order, there were so many errors I missed a few)
The first double page (left) has 6 issues:
1. The claim that AV will cost £250 million pounds. LIE
2. £130 million pounds will need to spent on electronic voting machines LIE
3. The "£26 million" on explaining the new system is included in the cost of the referendum and is from an unspecified source MISLEADING
4. Describes it as a "politicians fix" without saying what is being fixed SCAREMONGERING
5. They strongly imply that you must number all candidates when in fact you do not have to MISLEADING
6. Refer to the person coming third wining, no, the definition of wining is being changed. Also say that the least popular candidate can hold the balance of power both MISLEADING and SCAREMONGERING
7. Another incorrect claim regarding coming first MISLEADING
8. "AV is unpopular" LIE
9. "AV is not fair" unsubstantiated, no definition of fair and AV is considerably fairer than first past the post LIE
10. A popularity claim about AV from Australia is used despite no source being specified and yet another Papua New Guinea reference MISLEADING
11. The claim that the only major support for AV comes from the Lib Dems MISLEADING
but they did get one thing right:
"The vote will take place on Thursday 5 May - between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m." TRUTH!
The next page is a beauty in scaremongering:
12. Another strong suggestion that you must rank all candidates MISLEADING
13. Another claim regarding coming first and not wining MISLEADING
14. "AV will mean the end to equal votes" LIE
15. A deliberately long winded and complicated explanation of AV to make it seem far more complex MISLEADING
16. A claim that AV means some people get more than one vote LIE
17. A claim that it gives power to the BNP SCAREMONGERING
And finally...my favourite and the by far and away the worst page, the back cover:
![]() |
| The outrageously bad back cover. This is why politics needs changing |
18. "AV leads to broken promises LIE
19. It suggests Nick Clegg promised to make job cuts, increased VAT & tuition fees and cut public spending, when he tried to avoid all of the opposites MISLEADING
20. A lack of source of a quote from an MP MISLEADING
21. It would mean more hung parliaments LIE
22. More back room deals would be done LIE
23. AV is only for Nick Clegg LIE
24. Entirely negative campaigning
SCAREMONGERING
There are 24 reasons why politics needs changing, 24 reasons why the No to AV campaign should not be listened to and 24 reasons to Vote Yes on May 5!





